I See You – Observations in Change

“What you are speaks so loudly I can’t hear what you say”
Ralph Waldo Emerson

Behind The Mask, 2011, 9

Behind The Mask, 2011, 9 (Photo credit: iosue.williams)

The negativity, intolerance and divisiveness; the attacks on self worth and success – all this has to stop. We currently have a President who has never had a “real job” and who has never passed a piece of legislation without a supermajority running against a candidate, Mitt Romney, who has succeeded with collaboration in government and business.

Friday night there were 30,000 people at a Mitt Romney rally in Ohio. Hopefully enough honest people want to make a difference and believe in America that they will show up at the polls to overcome the democrats bussing in and bribing voters, or democrats like Jim Turner who vote multiple times. Could this be prevented? Yes. The only reason you would want to avoid or prevent voter registration is because you are doing something wrong. Like Democrat Jim Murphy. Is the type of ethics you want for our country?

Or perhaps you endorse this representation of free speech? Here is what you can look forward to in our education system. Click on this link:

Teen Ridiculed By Teacher

Obama says voting is the best revenge, again choosing words of conflict instead of collaboration. Mitt Romney wants you to vote for love of country.

Just as with the debate, a pretty clear difference – divide and conflict, or reconcile and find common ground.

Who would you rather count on to move this country into a more positive position? We already have 4 years of history that Obama really doesn’t want us to talk about. During his Presidential Campaign, he blamed Bush for the economy. In his first two years in office, with a Democrat majority in both the House of Representatives and in the Senate, the economy only got worse. And is still worse by all measures than when he was elected in 2008. He still has not passed a piece of legislation without the support of a supermajority.

I see you.

 

Advertisements

Does the Law Really Matter?

United States Capitol

United States Capitol (Photo credit: Phil Roeder)

This question has come up more frequently with this President than any other President that I can recall. Why? Well, for starters, remember this is a President who talked extensively about “transparency”. But, on an even more basic level, the real reason may be because we have rarely, if ever, had a President so divisive and polarizing. I also doubt we have ever seen a president more willing to utilize the government’s assets and his position for his own gain. Wait! Why do I say this? This President has been accused of:

Violating the War Powers Act
Hatch Act Violations
Unconstitutional Recess Appointments

In addition, the President is using United States assets, your tax dollars, to buy votes through a variety of entitlement programs

Cell Phone Program
Promoting usage of Food Stamps

Questions abound regarding the President’s view of the U.S. Constitution and the application of United States Law to President Obama. Do the laws of the United States apply to President Obama? Can he unilaterally decide to rewrite federal law?

Now we have the current administration encouraging employers to ignore the WARN Act. In case you are not intimate with the WARN Act, here is a quick overview. The WARN act (Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act) requires employers to give notice to employees and others within 60 days of a foreseeable mass layoff. The government’s position is that the roughly $500 billion cuts in defense spending that will kick in due to the automatic budget cuts if congress is unable to come to agreement on a new Budget is not a “given”. Meaning any job cuts can’t be “foreseeable”. Given that the President has not been able to pass a budget or work collaboratively with anyone, in or out of his own party, why would we think that suddenly we will be able to constructively avoid these cuts? The only way I can see a bi-partisan, functional budget being enacted is if there is a new President in the White House.

But this gets even better. The administration not only asked companies to violate federal law, it also offered to use federal funds, your tax dollars, to cover the legal fees to defend against subsequent legal challenges? So we are going to use federal funds to help defend people who violated the federal law?

Do you think that maybe the administration doesn’t want the public to understand the frightening impact of Sequestration Transparency Act? How far is President Obama willing to bend, or break, the laws to ensure he is re-elected? How far are you willing to let him go?