Much ado about nothing – Military Support for Obama?

Formal and informal group photographs of the J...

Formal and informal group photographs of the Joint Chiefs of Staff: GEN Colin Powell (USA), GEN Carl E. Vuono (USA), GEN Larry D. Welch (USAF), GEN Robert T. Herres (USAF), Admiral Carlisle A. H. Trost (USN), GEN Alfred M. Gray (USMC). Also other staff members. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Colin Powell, along with four (4) other retired military officers recently announced his support for Barak Obama to great fanfare.

Contrast that level of support with the list  at the link below. How about this list?

500 Generals and Admirals support Romney

500 retired Generals and Admirals thought it was important enough to pay for the ad supporting Governor Romney. 66% of our active military members support Romney.

500 retired top military brass. 66% of active Military.

I know whose opinion I am giving more weight to.

Please make sure you vote tomorrow.

The Most Damning Critique of Liberalism and Best Advocacy for Conservatism I’ve Seen in a Long Time

Well done video, the message is well worth the time to watch it. Conservatism is a belief, not a political party.

Make sure you get out and VOTE

The Rio Norte Line

If I could have one wish today, it would be that everyone in this nation would take 8 minutes and watch this video…

View original post

The Gospel of Envy – will we make a different choice?

“Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy. Its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery”
– Winston Churchill

I have written previously about friends and colleagues who have immigrated from elsewhere to live and work here in the United States, and who also have expressed concerns regarding the frightening direction the current administration is taking our country.

You don’t have to take my word for it anymore. Thomas Peterffy makes the statement in his own words. He came from Hungary, behind the iron curtain, in 1956 and started from scratch to make his own successful career.

Here is a person who has experienced life in a socialist society, had the opportunity to live his adult life in a free market democracy – the United States of America – and is now very concerned that we are heading back to the philosophy of failure and misery that marks socialism. Take the time to watch this and consider his words.

“Freedom is never more than one generation from extinction. We didn’t pass it to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the same.”
– Ronald Reagan

Are we no longer a sovereign republic free from outside intervention?

English: Woman standing, as America, facing sl...

English: Woman standing, as America, facing slightly right; holding U.S. flag and flag pole. Illustration in: Draperies in Action. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Desperation among the democratic party has risen to new levels as Foreign Observers are invited to “monitor” 2012 Presidential election results for democrats

International Monitors at polling places

I actually thought this was a joke the first time I was told about it.  Too ridiculous to be true, right?  Turns out that it may be ridiculous, but it isn’t just a rumor.

I think it ironic that America, the most successful, longest living democracy in recorded history may potentially have international monitors.  I would find it less offensive if this were perhaps an instructional exercise – an opportunity for the observers to see how a free election should be held.  However, it is not.

This is arguably the most important election in generations; perhaps in our history.   Nothing less than the continued existence of a free, democratic, free market society and the devolution to a socialist, managed society hangs in the balance.  A few things I find interesting about the situation:

  • The countries involved are Socialist democracies at best, pure socialism or totalitarian at worst.  Kazakhstan?  Really?
  • The proposed monitors are from countries with overwhelming socialist support for Obama, or a vested interest in Obama’s re-election.  How neutral do you think these observers will be?
  • These international observers are challenging the rights of individual states within the republic.  Talk about outside interference.

Ironically, the very same parties who are dead set against laws to restrict voter fraud or voter identification are the ones asking for this “international monitoring”!  What are they looking for?  We know they are not interested in ensuring that only registered voters submit their vote in a legal manner.  So what is it?  The fact that your candidate is dropping in the polls is not an indication of voting fraud.  If your candidate is not elected – that also is not an indication of fraud.  Manipulating results, subjecting United States Citizens to the laws of other countries, or interference from other nation in our internal election certainly is.  Remember, this is the party that took a vote on a change to the Democratic Platform on television for the world to see.  Three times they took a vote.  Three times they didn’t get the answer they wanted.  So finally, they simply did what they wanted anyway.  These are the people worried about a fair election?  You have to wonder what fair looks like to them.

If we have to submit to outside monitoring for fraud, here are a few of suggestions:

  • Make sure the voters are actually legal, registered voters
  • Make sure the voters are voting on their own free will, not bussed in and told who to vote for
  • Make sure there are no quid pro quo’s – you vote, we will give you a ____ (Fill in the blank)
  • Make sure that the voter only votes once
  • Look into the error that delayed absentee ballots to our military serving overseas.  A group that just coincidentally is disenfranchised with the current Administration.

I personally hope every legal registered voter participates in this election.  I hope every single citizen takes this duty seriously and shows up to vote.  However, as with almost every single moderate or conservative voter I know, I do want them to vote legally – I am not sure why this is such a problem?

What does it tell you when a party is so concerned with ensuring ineligible or illegal voters have a chance to cast a vote that they are willing to sacrifice our nation’s sovereignty?   I am a little concerned that a political party is dependent on illegal or unregistered voters – aren’t you?  Shouldn’t this election be determined by American Citizens?  This would seem to be a serious issue to me.

Please take the time to vote on November the 6th.

“It is error alone which needs the support of government.  Truth can stand by itself”

–          Thomas Jefferson

Sell Not Liberty – Finding the debt

Ben Franklin's 13 Virtues

Ben Franklin’s 13 Virtues (Photo credit: Austin Moody)

When the people find that they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.  Sell not liberty to purchase power.

–          Benjamin Franklin

Today, there is a $1 trillion gulf between spending on major entitlement programs and the money we devote to public investments.

To be clear, this means we spend more on entitlements than public investments.  Does that concern you?
Democrats Must Cut Entitlements

Indeed, federal welfare spending actually totals more than $14,848 for every poor man, woman and child in this country. For a typical poor family of three, that amounts to more than $44,500. Combined with state and local spending, government spends $20,610 for every poor person in America — or $61,830 per poor family of three.

By that measure we should have already eliminated poverty, yet…

Obama encouraging Americans to get on Welfare

More than 10.5 million people — about 5.3 percent of the population aged 25 and 64 — received disability checks in January from the federal government, the Post wrote, an 18 percent jump from before the recession.

…and the government is considering changing the definitions of disability so that even more people can file…

Millions file for disability when unemployment benefits run out

Additionally, the USDA reported this past summer Food Stamps usage hit a record high, and is up ~51% since 2008 – an expense of over $71 Billion dollars.

Total number of U.S. States where welfare pays more than an $8/hour job – 40.  Want to see some more startling statistics on the Welfare state?  Click here

Where does the money come from?  If you are wondering about the much ballyhooed 47%, take a look at the percentage of each income group that does NOT pay taxes.

US Households that Don’t Pay Income Tax

If Benjamin Franklin’s quote wasn’t enough for you, I will close with a quote from a famous Democrat.

 “Ask not what your country can do for you – ask what you can do for your country”

–          President John F. Kennedy

Here’s Really the Biggest Problem in the American Economy – What nobody wants to say Part #2

A continuation of our earlier discussion in response to yet another attack on a free market economy.  In the first discussion, Here’s Really The Biggest Problem in the American Economy – What Nobody Wants to Say Part #1 we tackled the notion of redistribution.  In today’s post we will continue by discussing the impacts of globalization.

“One reason corporations are so profitable is that they don’t employ as many Americans as they used to”
-Henry Blodget, Business Insider

global map test

global map test (Photo credit: aleutia)

Demographics are changing.

I would estimate close to 25% of the people on my floor at work are “immigrants” representing almost every continent in the world.  Some might be first generation; many are work visa or green card holders.  A decade ago, there was a growing concern that all the science and engineering jobs were going to recent graduates from other countries who were getting degrees in sciences and math.  Well, here is a wakeup call – it is not just the science and engineering jobs anymore.  Or medical jobs.  My colleagues are all in “business administration” – marketing, accounting, finance, procurement, supply chain, and sales. Most of these positions are entry level; new hires.

I applaud these colleagues; it is inspiring actually and makes for a more robust, interesting workplace.  However, let me point out that all these are jobs that did not go overseas.  And they aren’t getting “underpaid” either.  These are all jobs that could be had here by any of us.  The inconvenient truth behind this is that the demographics of employment are changing.  High wages or job growth for unskilled labor is a thing of the past.  The global workplace is also a knowledge based workplace.  We need to stop blaming the laborer snapping a widget together in some overseas sweatshop for unemployment here.  Let’s stop spending time railing against the terrible white collar employees and managers, or college kids that earn technical, science, math or other challenging degrees and encourage children to choose a path of knowledge.  Stop the demonization of professional positions.  Slamming on “college kids” and education comes across as sour grapes – and the impact is more than just you.  The children are listening.

“Globalization” has opened up a vast pool of billions of workers who work for much less than Americans.  This, in turn, has resulted in companies shifting formerly middle-wage-paying jobs overseas.

-Henry Blodget, Business Insider

While more products are being made overseas and certainly there are jobs that have gone overseas as well, let be fair – globalization has brought much production and jobs here to the US as well.  Companies like Toyota, BASF, Nestle, BAE, Bayer and many others all have operations here in the US employing our citizens.  Let’s not try to blame globalization for the loss of “good” paying jobs.   And if we continue to vote for the candidate who simply tells us what we want to hear, we will still be sitting on our collective sofas lamenting the “loss” of employment and opportunities while the good jobs both here and overseas are populated by…well, everyone else.  Some of our politicians are trying to create an economy of a select few political overlords who know what is best for 300+ million dependent serfs with a victim mentality.

In the coming days I will continue to discuss:

  • Globalization
  • Technology
  • Stagnant wages
  • Business Profits

Let me know your thoughts.

The original post from Henry Blodgett of the Business Insider can be found by clicking here

The Day After – The media really just doesn’t get it

That’s right, it isn’t only the Democratic Party that is completely out of touch with the moderate voters. If you spent any time what so ever looking at commentary after the first Presidential Debate, you will have noticed the desperate tone of much of the mainstream media trying to salvage something out of the debate for the Democrats. But it just wasn’t there. That behavior isn’t so unusual, so why am I saying the media doesn’t get it?

https://i2.wp.com/www.geeveeapps.com/clueless512x512.jpg

The general lamentation is that the President would have done so much better had he only mentioned:

• Caiman Islands and Tax Breaks
• Bain Capital
• The 47 percent

• Tea Party

Really? Look, I really don’t think folks in the middle have any beef with folks who comply with the tax law. As I have written in my previous blog post Would you pay more?, we have all had the opportunity to see Governor Romney’s taxes. He complied with the law. Would you pay more? Right, so lets just move on.

Bain Capital? So the man was successful in business. Now is that supposed to be a liability? Governor Romney has been just as successful in business as he has been in politics. Lets not pretend that success and experience is a turn off for the moderate voters. They want to see someone in the Oval Office with a track record of success and inspires confidence in the ability to actually make things happen.

The 47 percent. Yes, this resonates with the liberal voters. What the media is overlooking is that the liberal voters are going to vote for Obama anyway. There are people in the so-called 47% that are planning to vote for Governor Romney. Why? They might be in 47% due to business bankruptcy or for other reasons, but they understand what he was saying. And they still believe in a meritocracy, true freedom of speech, and want their children to have a shot at the American dream because they worked hard and earned their way to success – they don’t believe in an entitlement society. The 47% wins points only with people that have already made up their mind. And that was Governor Romney’s point.

Tea Party? Huh? I feel like I am watching Monty Python and “Knights Who Say ‘Nie’” scene! If you say Tea Party three times fast, are all conservatives supposed to quail in fear or something? What does the tea party have to do with anything that Governor Romney has been saying?

Joshua Green of BloombergBusinessWeek posted the following:

“The effect was mainly impressionistic—he did it without offering any new details. And he did it by emphasizing his “beliefs” (“great schools, great teachers”), which don’t necessarily align with his policies.”

What? Joshua did you do any research? Governor Romney has strong views on education and has taken steps as a governor to boost the education levels within the state of Massachusetts. I would expect better from a business periodical.

The fear that we will make a move away from the path of trickle down government control, and toward a more open society that includes a thriving business sector and a free, democratic process and has the possibility of strengthening the ties that bind us together, instead of the differences the democrats have emphasized in their attempt to divide us, has the left and much of the media in a panic.